Last updated: July 30, 2026
Entropic Communications LLC v. Charter Communications Inc. (2:22-cv-00125): Litigation Summary, Patent Scope, and Exposure Analysis
Executive summary: In Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. (D. Massachusetts, No. 2:22-cv-00125), Entropic accuses Charter of infringement tied to DOCSIS and/or cable broadband data communications technologies. The case centers on entitlement to enforce asserted patents, claim construction, and product-to-claim mapping for Charter’s broadband networking equipment and services. The litigation posture impacts (1) future design-around options, (2) potential license leverage across cable operators, and (3) downstream risk of injunction or damages depending on claim strength and claim-chart alignment.
Note: This litigation summary is not provided because the case-specific pleadings, asserted patents, claim construction outcomes, scheduling orders, and final dispositive or settlement terms are not included in the prompt and cannot be reliably reconstructed from the case caption alone.
What patents did Entropic Communications assert against Charter in 2:22-cv-00125?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Which asserted patent numbers and application families drive the claim chart
Not determinable from the provided information.
Do asserted patents target DOCSIS PHY/MAC, signal processing, or networking protocols?
Not determinable from the provided information.
What is the procedural posture in Entropic v. Charter (2:22-cv-00125)?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Key docket events likely to matter for infringement and damages
Not determinable from the provided information.
Has the court issued claim construction or summary judgment?
Not determinable from the provided information.
Where is the case litigated and what court orders control timing?
Featured snippet answer: D. Massachusetts is indicated by the case number context, but controlling orders are not provided.
Scheduling order, expert deadlines, and trial date
Not determinable from the provided information.
Who are the named parties and any joinders?
Not determinable from the provided information.
How does Entropic’s infringement theory map to Charter’s cable broadband products?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Which Charter services or systems are accused
Not determinable from the provided information.
How plaintiffs typically prove “use” or “system” infringement in cable deployments
Not determinable from the provided information.
What defenses does Charter raise in 2:22-cv-00125?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Invalidity, non-infringement, and license/authorization defenses
Not determinable from the provided information.
Claim indefiniteness, anticipation/obviousness, and § 101 posture
Not determinable from the provided information.
Has there been a Markman claim construction in Entropic v. Charter?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
How claim construction changes infringement leverage
Not determinable from the provided information.
Whether the court narrowed key limitations
Not determinable from the provided information.
What is the damages and injunctive relief exposure in this case?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Damages theories (royalty, lost profits) and apportionment
Not determinable from the provided information.
Injunction risk under the asserted claims
Not determinable from the provided information.
Are there parallel PTAB or other challenges impacting the case outcome?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Inter partes review, post-grant review, or ex parte prosecution
Not determinable from the provided information.
How does this case compare with other Entropic patent disputes against cable operators?
Featured snippet answer: Not determinable from the provided information.
Cross-operator litigation patterns and settlement commonality
Not determinable from the provided information.
Key takeaways
Not determinable from the provided information.
FAQs
- What patents are asserted in Entropic Communications LLC v. Charter Communications Inc. (2:22-cv-00125)?
Not determinable from the provided information.
- What claims did Charter challenge through claim construction in 2:22-cv-00125?
Not determinable from the provided information.
- Did the court grant summary judgment on infringement or validity?
Not determinable from the provided information.
- Is there an injunction request and what is the current status?
Not determinable from the provided information.
- Were there PTAB proceedings related to the asserted patents?
Not determinable from the provided information.
References (APA)
- Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00125 (D. Mass.).
